Zebra 3400 Honeywell CK67 Comparison

The Zebra MC3400 and Honeywell CK67 are comparable rugged mobile computers in both size and weight, though the CK67 is slightly larger and heavier than the MC3400. Both devices are powered by the same Qualcomm 4490 octa-core 2.4GHz processor, offering strong performance for demanding enterprise applications. 

Below are the key features of both the Zebra MC3400 and CK67 that will impact the day-to-day and enduser performance.

Zebra MC3400 vs. Honeywell CK67: Android OS Upgradeability and Lifecycle Support

When it comes to Android OS upgradeability, the two models differ and should considered when investing in new equipment.  The Honeywell CK67 base model is guaranteed upgradeable through Android 18, offering extended software support.  The Zebra MC3400 is upgradeable to Android 15 in standard configurations, but select premium configurations support upgrades up to Android 18, matching the CK67’s lifecycle in those models.

Long-term Android support should be a priority for your deployment, this distinction could be a key factor when choosing between the two devices.  

Winner:  Honeywell CK67 – Better Futureproofing for Android Versions. 

Zebra MC3400 vs. Honeywell CK67: RAM and Storage Options Compared

Both the Zebra MC3400 and Honeywell CK67 offer more than enough memory for most enterprise applications. The Honeywell CK67 comes standard with 8GB DDR5 RAM and 128GB UFS flash storage, providing high-speed performance and ample capacity for demanding workloads.

The MC3400 comes standard with 4GB RAM/ 64 GB Flash, but premium  options are available with 6GB RAM /  64GB Flash or 6GB RAM / 128GB Flash.

These flexible memory options allow the MC3400 to be tailored to various business needs and budgets, while the CK67 delivers a consistently high-spec standard configuration.

Winner: Honeywell CK67 – Higher Memory

Zebra MC3400 vs. Honeywell CK67: 2D Scan Engine Performance and Range

Both the Zebra MC3400 and Honeywell CK67 offer standard range and extended range scan engines.  

For the standard Range, the Honeywell CK67 has the Honeywell S0703 2D imager.  The S0703 has a scan rate of 60 scans per second.  The scan engine can decode 2D barcodes as small as 7 mils from up to a foot away.  The S0703 can scan a 5 mil / code39 barcode from 3 inches to 1 ft away.  The S0703 can scan a 20 mil / code39 from 2 inches to 36 inches away. 

In real-world conditions, the Honeywell CK67 equipped with the standard-range S0703 2D imager can reliably scan a standard barcode distances of up to 3 feet. 

The MC3400 answers back with two standard range options – the SE4710 & SE4770.  The SE4710 can decode a 4 mil / Code39 from 3.3 inches to 8.8 inches away.  The SE4710 can decode a 20 mil / Code39 from 2 inches to 30 inches away.  The SE4770 has a scan rate of 104 (+/- 12) scans per second. can decode a 3 mil / code39 from 3 inches to 5.8 inches away.  The SE4770 is rated to decode a 20 mil / code39 from 1.6 inches to 36.1 inches away. 

In real-world conditions, the Zebra MC3400 equipped with the standard-range SE4770 2D imager can reliably scan a standard barcode distances of up to 3 feet. 

Winner:  Zebra MC3400 – The S0703 & SE4770 match up, except for the scan rate.  104 (+/- 12) scans/sec to 60 scans/sec

For the Extended Range options, the Zebra MC3400 has the SE58 and the CK67 has the FlexRange XLR.

The CK67’s S0803 FlexRange XLR has a scan rate of 60 scans per second.  The FlexRange can decode up to 80ft away.  The S0803 FlexRange can decode a 5 mil / Code39 barcode from 5 inches to 1.5 ft. At the farthest, the FlexRange can decode a 100 mil /  code39 from 12 inches to 80 ft.

The MC3400’s SE58 scan rate was not available on the specification sheet.  The SE58 can decode a 5 mil / code39 barcode from 2.1 inches to 4.8 ft.  at the farthest, the SE58 can decode a 100 mil / code39  up to 107.1 ft.  There is not a near distance recorded on the spec sheet.

Winner: Zebra MC3400 – The SE58 can decode smaller barcodes at a wider range than the S0803 Flexrange. 

Based on specifications, the Zebra MC3400 outperforms the Honeywell CK67 when it comes to scanning.  It’s important to note that actual scan / read rates and ranges depend on the environment and label.  We always recommend tested out both the MC3400 and CK67 in a real world environment if the scan engine is the deciding factor.

Zebra MC3400 vs. Honeywell CK67: Backwards Compatibility and Integration

Why We Recommend the Honeywell CK67 Over the Zebra MC3400

After extensive hands-on experience, our team consistently prefers the Honeywell CK67 over the Zebra MC3400—and many of our enterprise clients agree. For organizations focused on futureproofing, competitive pricing, and reliable service, the CK67 stands out as the smarter long-term investment.

While the Zebra MC3400 may offer marginally better scan engine specifications on paper, real-world performance shows little noticeable difference for most end users. In contrast, the Honeywell CK67 delivers:

• More aggressive pricing, helping reduce deployment costs across large fleets
• Strong service and support, backed by Honeywell’s global infrastructure
• Guaranteed Android OS upgrades through version 18, ensuring long-term compatibility with enterprise apps

If you’re looking for a rugged mobile computer that balances performance, value, and future-readiness, the Honeywell CK67 is the clear choice.